anni is okay (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} estrie) wrote,@ 2004-12-22 20:38:00 |
|
Kill Bill Volume 2
Let me put it this way...
The title of the movies is Kill Bill. She's going to kill Bill. It's sort of the goal. Quentin Tarantino probably did not accidentally make the killing of Bill mediocre or not as [fill in the blank] as the first one, or as expected. I'm guessing there were reasons Kill Bill 2 is the way it is. Different from Kill Bill 1, I mean, in the ways that it is different.
Don't get me wrong, it's entirely possible he did fuck the whole second part up. People fuck up all the time, right? But let's assume he didn't completely fuck up. Well, it's sort of like any piece of art. It's good, bad, or anything else at every individual's discretion. And if an artist has a point but it's not clear enough to understand, then that's the communicator's fault, pretty much. Not that I'm saying Tarantino had a point. I just switched my train of thought very abruptly.
Let me put it this way...
The title of the movies is Kill Bill. She's going to kill Bill. It's sort of the goal. Quentin Tarantino probably did not accidentally make the killing of Bill mediocre or not as [fill in the blank] as the first one, or as expected. I'm guessing there were reasons Kill Bill 2 is the way it is. Different from Kill Bill 1, I mean, in the ways that it is different.
Don't get me wrong, it's entirely possible he did fuck the whole second part up. People fuck up all the time, right? But let's assume he didn't completely fuck up. Well, it's sort of like any piece of art. It's good, bad, or anything else at every individual's discretion. And if an artist has a point but it's not clear enough to understand, then that's the communicator's fault, pretty much. Not that I'm saying Tarantino had a point. I just switched my train of thought very abruptly.
